Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:24
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Apple’s Liquid Glass design is paving the way for AR glasses - TechCrunch
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The Sin of Inaction: How Yates took the Giro, and UAE let it go - Escape Collective
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sex advice: I'm finally ready to enter my promiscuity era. But there's a catch. - Slate Magazine
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
If You Have an Asus Router, You Need to Check If It's Been Hacked - Lifehacker
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Does having the wrong address on my car insurance invalidate my policy?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Childhood infections, stress may increase MS risk: Study - Multiple Sclerosis News Today
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.